Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) Investigation Response Documentation

This guide explains the JSON response structure for Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) investigations, covering both individual and business entities. It details how potential matches are analyzed against watchlists, sanctions lists, politically exposed persons (PEPs) databases, and other risk sources.

Response Structure - Common Elements

Both individual and business investigations share these top-level fields:

FieldDescriptionExample Values
objectThe type of response object"individual_investigation" or "business_investigation"
confidence_scoreConfidence level of the assessment (0-100)85
statusCurrent status of the investigation"OPEN" or “CLOSED”
assessment_statusOverall assessment outcome"CLEARED" or "ESCALATED"
processing_stateState of processing“QUEUED”, “PROCESSING”, “COMPLETED” or “FAILED”
approval_stateApproval status"AI_CLEARED" or "AI_ESCALATED"
investigation_idUnique identifier for the investigationUUID string
organization_idID of the organization conducting the investigationUUID string

Investigation Summary (Both Individual & Business)

"investigation_summary": {
  "potential_matches_found": [number],
  "total_auto_cleared_matches": [number],
  "total_cleared_matches": [number],
  "total_escalated_matches": [number],
  "reason_for_clearing": [array of explanations],
  "reason_for_escalating": [array of explanations] // if applicable
}

Investigation Match Status (Both Types)

Categorizes matches by risk type, each with a status of "CLEARED" or "ESCALATED":

  • adverse_media
  • enforcement
  • politically_exposed_person
  • sanction
  • unclassified
  • state_owned_enterprise (business only)

Individual-Specific Response Elements

Personal Identity

"personal_identity": {
  "created_at": [timestamp],
  "date_of_birth": [date],
  "first_name": [string],
  "last_name": [string],
  "id": [UUID]
}

Individual Comparison Categories

Each potential match for individuals includes these comparison categories:

  1. Name Matching: Compares the individual's name to the entity's name
  2. Date of Birth Matching: Compares DOB information
  3. Image Matching: Compares visual identification (when available)
  4. Location Matching: Compares geographic information
  5. Politically Exposed Person Matching: Checks PEP status

Individual Example Assessment Summary

"The Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) investigation is cleared. The age verification confirms that the customer's date of birth, 1970-01-01, does not match the entity's date of birth, 1965, indicating they are not the same person. Although the name verification is escalated due to a match, and the PEP status is also escalated, the cleared age verification takes precedence."

Business-Specific Response Elements

Business Identity

"business_identity": {
  "id": [UUID],
  "investigation_id": [UUID],
  "business_name": [string],
  "business_website": [string],
  "business_registration_number": [string],
  "tax_identification_number": [string],
  "address_line_1": [string],
  "address_line_2": [string],
  "city": [string],
  "state": [string],
  "postal_code": [string],
  "country": [string],
  "nature_of_business": [array of business activities]
}

Business Comparison Categories

Each potential match for businesses includes these comparison categories:

  1. Name Matching: Analyzes business name similarities
  2. Nature of Business Matching: Compares business activities
  3. Location Matching: Analyzes geographic information
  4. Tax Number/Business Registration Matching: Verifies official identification numbers

Business Example Assessment Summary

"The business entity has been escalated for review due to significant similarities with a state-owned enterprise with strong ties to government entities under international sanctions. The business name match (92% similarity) and overlapping business activities in telecommunications infrastructure warrant further investigation into potential regulatory compliance risks."

Potential Matches (Both Types)

Each investigation includes an array of potential matches. Each match contains:

FieldDescription
idUnique identifier for the match
assessment_statusOverall status (CLEARED or ESCALATED)
entity_assessment_summaryHuman-readable explanation of the assessment
entity_details_summaryOverview of the matched entity
match_typeCategories of risk (e.g., "adverse_media", "sanctions")
nameName of the matched entity
also_known_asAlternative names for the entity
country_detailsCountries associated with the entity
confidence_scoreMatch confidence (0-100)
comparisonDetailed analysis of the match (see below)

Comparison Object (Both Individual and Business)

Each comparison includes multiple validation categories (varying by individual/business) with:

  • summary: Detailed explanation of the analysis
  • status: Result of the analysis (CLEARED, ESCALATED, or INCOMPLETE)

Assessment Status Definitions

StatusDescription
CLEAREDNo significant risk or concern identified
ESCALATEDRequires further human review due to potential risk
INCOMPLETEInsufficient information to make a determination

Match Types (Both Individual and Business)

TypeDescription
adverse_mediaNegative news reports
enforcementsRegulatory actions or legal penalties
politically_exposed_personPolitical figures and associates
sanctionEntries on sanctions lists
soesState-owned enterprises (business only)
unclassifiedOther types of matches

Use Case Examples

Individual Investigation Example

In an individual investigation for a person named "Bashar al-Assad" with DOB January 1, 1970, the system identified 11 potential matches but cleared all of them, primarily due to date of birth mismatches (mostly 1965) and some name format differences, despite similarities with several politically exposed persons.

Business Investigation Example

In a business investigation for ZTE Corporation, the system identified 23 potential matches, with 3 escalated for further review and 20 cleared. The investigation revealed potential connections to entities with adverse media coverage, regulatory enforcement actions, and state-owned enterprises, triggering an "ESCALATED" assessment status requiring human review.